
Approx.
544 pp., 61/8 x 91/4, 14 illus., notes, bibl., index
$24.95
paper
Published: Spring 2005
Add
Paper
View
cart
Checkout
|
Ella Baker and the Black Freedom Movement
A Radical Democratic Vision
by Barbara Ransby
Copyright
(c) 2003 by the University of North Carolina Press. All rights reserved.
Introduction
In
order for us as poor and oppressed people to become a part of a society
that is meaningful, the system under which we now exist has to be
radically changed. This means that we are going to have to learn to
think in radical terms. I use the term radical in its original
meaning—getting down to and understanding the root cause. It
means facing a system that does not lend itself to your needs and
devising means by which you change that system.
—Ella Baker, 1969
Ella Baker spent her entire adult life trying to
"change that system." Somewhere along the way she recognized that her
goal was not a single "end" but rather an ongoing "means," that is, a
process. Radical change for Ella Baker was about a persistent and
protracted process of discourse, debate, consensus, reflection, and
struggle. If larger and larger numbers of communities were engaged in
such a process, she reasoned, day in and day out, year after year, the
revolution would be well under way. Ella Baker understood that laws,
structures, and institutions had to change in order to correct
injustice and oppression, but part of the process had to involve
oppressed people, ordinary people, infusing new meanings into the
concept of democracy and finding their own individual and collective
power to determine their lives and shape the direction of history.
These were the radical terms that Ella Baker thought in and the radical
ideas she fought for with her mind and her body. Just as the "end" for
her was not a scripted utopia but another phase of struggle, the means
of getting there was not scripted either. Baker's theory of social
change and political organizing was inscribed in her practice. Her
ideas were written in her work: a coherent body of lived text spanning
nearly sixty years.
Biography
is a profoundly personal genre of historical scholarship, and the
humbling but empowering process of finding our own meanings in another
person's life poses unique challenges. As biographers, we ask questions
about lives that the subjects themselves may never have asked outright
and certainly did not consciously answer. Answers are always elusive.
We search for them by carefully reading and interpreting the fragmented
messages left behind. Feminist biographers and scholar-activists like
myself face particular challenges. It is imperative that we be ever
cautious of the danger inherent in our work: imposing our contemporary
dilemmas and expectations on a generation of women who spoke a
different language, moved at a different rhythm, and juggled a
different set of issues and dilemmas. The task of tailoring a life to
fit a neat and cohesive narrative is a daunting one: an awkward and
sometimes uncomfortable process of wading barefoot into the still and
often murky waters of someone else's life, interrogating her choices,
speculating about her motives, mapping her movements, and weighing her
every word. No single descriptor ever seems adequate to capture the
richly nuanced complexity of a life fully lived. Every term is
inherently inadequate, each one loaded with someone else's meanings,
someone else's baggage. How can a biographer frame a unique life,
rendering it full-bodied, textured, even contradictory, yet still
accessible for those who want to step inside and look around?
My
journey into Ella Jo Baker's world has been a personal, political, and
intellectual journey, often joyous and at times painful. It has taken
me in and out of some twenty cities and to numerous libraries,
archives, county courthouses, kitchen tables, front porches, and a few
dusty attics. This long journey has been marked by periods of difficult
separation followed by hopeful reunions. In the process I have
revisited the faces, experiences, and southern roots of my own mother,
father, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins: Mississippi
sharecroppers, domestic and factory workers, honest, generous,
hard-working, resilient black people. Most importantly, in the process
I have developed an intense and unique relationship with my subject. I
have chatted, argued, commiserated, and rejoiced with Ella Baker in an
ongoing conversation between sisters, one living and one dead. In this
book, I have tried to tell Ella Baker's story partly as she would have
told it and partly the way I—a historian and an activist of a
different time and place—felt it had to be told.
There
are those who insist that biographical writing is compromised and
tainted by an author's identification and closeness with her subject.
This does not have to be the case. I do not apologize for my admiration
for Ella Baker. She earned it. I admire her for the courageous and
remarkable life she led and for the contributions she made without any
promise of immediate reward. I admire her for the ways in which she
redefined the meaning of radical and engaged intellectual work, of
cross-class and interracial organizing, and of a democratic and
humanistic way of being in the world, all the while trying to mold the
world around her into something better.
…
I first came upon Ella Baker's story through my search for political
role models, not research subjects. As an anti-apartheid and antiracist
student activist at Columbia University and the University of Michigan
in the 1980s and as a black feminist organizer thereafter, I was drawn
to the example of Ella Baker as a woman who fought militantly but
democratically for a better world and who fought simultaneously for her
own right to play more than a circumscribed role in that world. As an
insurgent intellectual with a passion for justice and democracy, Ella
Baker held an affinity for the most oppressed sectors of our society.
So, my first connection to Ella Baker was a political one. This
connection has enhanced rather than lessened my desire to be thorough,
rigorous, and balanced in my treatment of her life and ideas. For me,
there is more at stake in exploring Ella Baker's story than an
interesting intellectual exercise or even the worthy act of writing a
corrective history that adds a previously muted, black, female voice to
the chorus of people from the past. To understand her weaknesses as
well as her strengths, her failures as well as her triumphs, her
confusion as well as her clarity is to pay her the greatest honor I can
imagine. To tell her life truths with all their depth and richness is
to affirm her humanity and all that she was able to accomplish, because
of and at times in spite of who she was. There are vital political and
historical lessons to be gleaned by looking back in time through the
lens of Ella Baker's life.
Ella
Josephine Baker's activist career spanned from 1930 to 1980, touched
thousands of lives, and contributed to over three dozen organizations.
She was an internationalist, but her cultural and political home was
the African American community. So it is within the Black Freedom
Movement in the United States—the collective efforts of
African Americans to attain full human rights, from the nadir of
segregation at the turn of the twentieth century through the peak of
the civil rights movement in the 1960s and beyond—that I
locate her story. For Baker, as for W. E. B. Du Bois, racism was the
litmus test for American democracy and for international human rights.
Both were convinced that racism had infected every major social problem
of the twentieth century: colonialism and imperialism, war and fascism,
the oppression of women, the politics of crime and punishment, and the
exploitation of labor; both recognized that very little progress could
be made without tackling the political cargo of race. Baker organized
for democratic rights for over fifty years, from Harlem to Mississippi,
in interracial coalitions and African American organizations, and
(unlike Du Bois) she lived to see the day when ordinary black folks
enjoyed some of the fruits of freedom. But she died knowing that the
process of struggle and social transformation would continue.
Ella
Baker played a pivotal role in the three most prominent black freedom
organizations of her day: the National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People (NAACP); the Southern Christian Leadership Conference
(SCLC); and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC;
pronounced "snick"). She worked alongside some of the most prominent
black male leaders of the twentieth century: W. E. B. Du Bois, Thurgood
Marshall, George Schuyler, Walter White, A. Philip Randolph, Martin
Luther King Jr., and Stokely Carmichael. However, Baker had contentious
relationships with all these men and the organizations they headed,
with the exception of SNCC during its first six years. For much of her
career she functioned as an "outsider within." She was close to the
centers of power within the black community, but she was always a
critical and conditional insider, a status informed by her gender,
class loyalties, and political ideology. Baker criticized unchecked
egos, objected to undemocratic structures, protested unilateral
decision making, condemned elitism, and refused to nod in loyal
deference to everything "the leader" had to say. These stances often
put her on the outside of the inner circle.
While
her most public political associations were with men, some of Ella
Baker's most significant and sustaining relationships were with a group
of women activists, some of them not very well-known, who were her
friends and co-workers over many years. These women provided the
sisterly support that allowed Baker to fight all of the battles she
did, both inside and outside the Black Freedom Movement. Ella Baker was
part of a powerful, yet invisible network of dynamic and influential
African American women activists who sustained civil rights causes, and
one another, across several generations. Her life intersected with such
notable black women as Anna Arnold Hedgeman, Dorothy Height, Nannie
Helen Burroughs, Pauli Murray, Mary McLeod Bethune, Septima Clark, and
Fannie Lou Hamer. She was dear friends with NAACP legends Ruby Hurley
and Lucille Black. As Diane Nash and Eleanor Holmes Norton suggest,
women like Ella Baker were laying the foundation for contemporary black
feminists even before the term was invented. This earlier generation of
women lived the politics others have since written about, challenging
treatment that belittled the seriousness of their contributions,
resisting models of organizing that placed men and men's work at the
center, and carving out public identities as leaders, strategists, and
public intellectuals—identities that were generally reserved
for men.
A
creative and independent thinker and doer, Baker operated in a
political world that was, in many ways, not fully ready for her. She
inserted herself into leadership situations where others thought she
simply did not belong. Her unique presence pioneered the way for fuller
participation by other women in political organizations, and it
reshaped the positions within the movement that they would occupy. At
each stage she nudged the movement in a leftward, inclusive, and
democratic direction, learning and modifying her own position as she
went.
For
Ella Baker, anchoring her activism within the black freedom struggle
was not simply a matter of identity but rather a part of a political
analysis that recognized the historical significance of racism as the
cornerstone of an unjust social and economic order in the United States
extending back to slavery. A movement for black freedom, defined
broadly, she thought, would inevitably be a movement against economic
exploitation and the oppressive conditions faced by other groups within
American society as well. At least it had that potential. African
Americans and, in a complex variety of ways, other peoples of color
were excluded from basic access to the political process, marginalized
socially, and super-exploited economically for the better part of the
twentieth century. If this contradiction could not be confronted, Baker
felt, there was no hope for American society as a whole. More
precisely, she felt that to push and challenge political and economic
leaders on this question would expose some of the society's fundamental
flaws and serve as an impetus for transformative social change on
multiple fronts.
An
aging and irascible Virginia Durr, the legendary white civil rights
activist from Montgomery, once confronted me at a conference to remind
me that "Ella Baker didn't just belong to black people." She was right.
Baker's work, influence, and political family extended well beyond the
confines of the African American community and the struggle against
racism. She had strong ties to the more democratic tendencies within
the white left. She worked closely with the multiracial labor and
cooperative movements, while at the same time championing struggles
against colonialism and imperialism around the world.
Ella
Baker was concerned with the plight of African Americans, but she was
also passionately committed to a broader humanitarian struggle for a
better world. Over the course of her life, she was involved in more
than thirty major political campaigns and organizations, addressing
such issues as the war in Vietnam, Puerto Rican independence, South
African apartheid, political repression, prison conditions, poverty,
unequal education, and sexism. Still, because of who she
was—a daughter of the Jim Crow South and a granddaughter of
slaves—and because of the political analysis she formulated
early in her career, which was centered on antiracist politics, Baker's
primary frame of reference was the African American experience and the
struggle for black freedom.
Baker
identified with and helped advance a political tradition that is
radical, international, and democratic, with women at its center. She
critiqued black separatism as a narrow, dead-end strategy, yet she did
not hesitate to criticize the chauvinism and racism of white colleagues
in multiracial coalitions all the while stressing the importance of
black leadership. Her own political ideology and worldview was a result
of the cross-fertilization of the vibrant black Baptist women's
movement of the early twentieth century, the eclectic and international
political culture of Depression-era Harlem, and the American tradition
of democratic socialism—a variegated mix of northern and
southern, religious and secular, American and global, left and liberal
elements.
Ella
Baker's life gives us a sense of the connections and continuities that
link together a long tradition of African American resistance. Each
intergenerational organization she joined, each story she told, each
lesson she passed on was a part of the connective tissue that formed
the body politic of the Black Freedom Movement in the United States
from the 1930s into the 1980s. Following Baker's path back through the
years, trying to look at national and world events from her vantage
point, takes us to different sites of struggle, opens up different
windows of conversation, and pushes us into different people's lives
than if we were to have someone else as our guide.
Finally,
Ella Baker was a skilled grassroots organizer and an "organic"
intellectual—one who learned lessons from the street more
than from the academy and who sought to understand the world in order
to change it. Many other activists looked to her, especially during the
last half of her life, for her strategic and analytical insights and
guidance. Her radical, democratic, humanistic worldview, her confidence
in the wisdom of the black poor, and her emphasis on the importance of
group-centered, grassroots leadership set her apart from most of her
political contemporaries. Her ideas and example influenced not only
SNCC in the 1960s but also the leaders of Students for a Democratic
Society (SDS) and embryonic women's movements of the late 1960s and
early 1970s.[1] Baker was a role model and mentor for an entire
generation of activists who came of age politically in the 1960s.
Within progressive circles, even those who did not know her knew of
her.
Ella
Baker was a movement teacher who exemplified a radical pedagogy,
similar to that of Latin American educator and political organizer
Paulo Freire. She sought to empower those she taught and regarded
learning as reciprocal. Baker's message was that oppressed people,
whatever their level of formal education, had the ability to understand
and interpret the world around them, to see that world for what it was
and to move to transform it. Her primary public constituency was the
dispossessed. She viewed a democratic learning process and discourse as
the cornerstone of a democratic movement.
Ella
Baker's private life was as unconventional as her public one. For
example, many of her political colleagues never knew that she had, at
one time, been married. She deemphasized her married life, never took
her husband's name, and traveled extensively over the course of her
nearly twenty-year marriage. Throughout the marriage, her principal
passion was politics; after her divorce, she was singularly devoted to
her first love.
Some
aspects of Ella Baker's private life remain a mystery, not because I
have not snooped and pried with the voyeuristic appetite of a private
detective, but because she was so consciously and thoroughly discreet
about personal affairs and protective of her family and domestic life.
One of my chief frustrations as a biographer has been the difficulty of
attempting to follow the trail of a woman who, in many respects, tried
not to leave one. There is no memoir or diary, nor are there boxes of
intimate personal correspondence. What remains is, for the most part,
her public voice and presence as documented in over thirty archival and
manuscript collections of organizations and individuals across the
country. Her own personal papers, which chronicle only part of the
story, are now deposited at the Schomburg Center for Research in Black
Culture in Harlem. I have spent untold hours pouring over the documents
there. I have interviewed dozens of people who knew her and tracked
down letters, papers, and photographs in the most out-of-the-way
places. Yet there is much we may never know.
A
part of interpreting and revisiting Ella Baker's life has involved a
series of oral history interviews with friends, family members, and
co-workers who knew her over the years. These conversations gave me not
only the facts about Baker's life but the feel of it as well. While
these excavated memories helped me add movement and fluidity to
otherwise still-life snapshots of Baker, I also appreciate the limits
of our recollective powers. I have tried in every instance possible to
find more than one source to substantiate particular individual
assertions. In other instances I have qualified those assertions as
speculative or remembered. I also realize that written documents can be
misleading, so I do not mean to privilege them without condition. All
of the sources are used as pieces of a larger puzzle, reinforced by
other parts as they fit or don't fit what is already known. In addition
to the recollections and observations of others, I have tried to tap
Ella Baker's own words as much as possible. Even when speaking for
herself, however, in the dozen or so interviews that have been
preserved, Baker is more often than not speaking with the benefit and
the blurred vision of hindsight, years and in some cases decades after
the fact. As honest and straightforward a person as she was, and as
lucid as she was until the early 1980s, I cannot always afford to take
her at her word. Memories fade, ideas change, and thus what we thought
we felt or did at the time is filtered through the lens of our ongoing
sense of ourselves. In reconstructing her political views, however, I
gave Ella Baker and myself greater license than when reconstructing a
series of events largely because I am as concerned about where she
ended up politically and philosophically as I am with how she got
there. Her conclusions and self-representation are critical elements in
summing up her life's work and her ideas.
Psychologists
have written about the complex ways in which public individuals,
especially women, demarcate the boundaries between public and private
lives as a form of psychological protection. Ella Baker guarded her
privacy. Her refusal to talk about certain aspects of her past, while
being wholly open about others, resembles "the culture of dissemblance"
that historian Darlene Clark Hine talks about. In analyzing the silence
surrounding black women and rape, Hine writes: "By dissemblance I mean
the behavior and attitudes of black women that created the appearance
of openness and disclosure but actually shielded the truth of their
inner lives and selves from their oppressors."[2] In the case of Ella
Baker, the shielding was from public view and scrutiny, not only from
her oppressors, but often from friends and colleagues as well.
Shielding their private lives from public view provided a margin of
protection for black women of Ella Baker's generation, who were
vilified and stereotyped by whites and often circumscribed to a limited
sphere of activity by black men. According to her friend Lenora
Taitt-Magubane, Ella Baker never wanted to be "pigeon-holed." The less
known about the complex person she was, perhaps the less likely she was
to be sized up and assigned an identity with narrow borders. Bernice
Johnson Reagon once observed that Baker was the first woman she met who
would not allow a discussion of her marital status. This was liberating
for Reagon and other young women because they then felt personal and
romantic relationships could be left at the door when they went into a
meeting, which better enabled them to participate on their own terms
regardless of who they were or were not dating at the time. Hine
concludes that "a secret, undisclosed persona allowed the individual
black woman to function, to work effectively as a domestic in
(sometimes hostile) white households."[3] I would add that it may have
allowed Ella Baker and many of her female counterparts to function more
effectively—although not without a psychological
price—within predominately male civil rights leadership
circles. Still, all was not shielded from public view. And from
literally thousands of documents, articles, interviews, flyers,
letters, and FBI reports emerges the story of Ella Baker's amazing and
incandescent life.
…
This biography surveys Ella Baker's long and rich political career in
an effort to explain the unique political and intellectual
contributions she made to the movement for radical democratic change in
America. Like most biographies, it begins by exploring the familial and
educational experiences that were the foundation of her public
political life. Baker's childhood and schooling through college are
covered in chapters 1 and 2. Baker's well-read and deeply religious
mother was her moral anchor in her early years, providing her with
intellectual training and a sense of social responsibility that she
would carry with her always. Her time in boarding school and college at
Shaw Academy and University in Raleigh, North Carolina, was a period of
intellectual and political growth. Baker had a stellar academic career
and organized her first protest against what she perceived as an unjust
exercise of authority by college administrators. Chapter 3 explores
Ella Baker's eye-opening cultural and political encounters in Harlem in
the late 1920s and 1930s, a time when she secularized her childhood
values and embraced the radical democratic vision of social change that
she would modify and build on for the next half century. In chapter 4 I
survey Ella Baker's six-year tenure as a part of the national staff of
the NAACP from 1940 to 1946, first as a field secretary and then as the
national director of branches. During the intense period of World War
II, Ella Baker traveled throughout the minefield of the American South,
organizing local branches, encouraging local leaders to be more active,
and building up a network of contacts that she would rely on for years
to come. In her capacity as the NAACP's director of branches, Baker
sought to democratize the organization by empowering local and regional
leaders and by deemphasizing legal battles and giving more attention to
grassroots struggles. Chapter 5 focuses on Baker's work concerning
school reform and police brutality in New York City in the 1950s; these
struggles occurred against the backdrop of mounting anticommunist and
Cold War policies and rhetoric. Baker herself had a curious and
ambivalent relationship to the communist question, one that evolved and
changed over time.
The
second half of the book deals with the period of the modern civil
rights and black power movements, the apex of Baker's political
sojourn. Chapters 6 and 7 chronicle Ella Baker's work with the SCLC in
the mid- to late 1950s and specifically her concentrated work with the
more active SCLC affiliates in Shreveport, Louisiana, and Birmingham,
Alabama. Chapter 6 offers a perspective on Baker's complicated and
conflicted relationship with Martin Luther King Jr. and the tensions
between them, which revolved largely around their divergent views on
leadership and organization. Chapters 8 and 9 detail Baker's pivotal
role in the founding of SNCC and her capacity as mentor and adviser to
the young activists of that group from 1960 to 1966. Chapters 10 and 11
focus on SNCC's work in Mississippi in the 1960s, her work with the
Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP) and the rise of black
power. Chapter 11 ends with a discussion of Ella Baker's political
involvement in the 1970s and 1980s after the collapse of SNCC. During
the final years of her life, Ella Baker spoke out passionately against
political repression and in support of anticolonial struggles, most
notably in connection with the Free Angela Davis campaign and the
Puerto Rican Independista Movement. For several years she also lent her
name and her dwindling energies to an effort to create an independent
third political party to the left of the Democrats through the Mass
Party Organizing Committee.
The
book concludes, in chapter 12, by outlining Ella Baker's political
philosophy as it relates to both historical and contemporary contexts,
offering a living legacy to all of us who share her vision of a more
just and democratic society, not as an event in history but as an
ongoing process around which to organize our lives and work.
…
On Saturday, December 13, 1986, precisely eighty-three years to the day
after her birth, Ella Jo Baker died quietly in her sleep in the modest
Harlem apartment she had occupied off and on for nearly forty years.
The end of her life did not come as a surprise to those close to her.
She had been sick for some time, and her health had been spiraling
downward rapidly in the months preceding her death. But as natural and
uneventful as her passage may have seemed, it represented the end of a
rich and influential political career, and even the end of an era.
Those who gathered to mourn her death the following Friday symbolized
in their diversity the breadth and depth of Ella Baker's influence on
American politics for the better part of the twentieth century.
It
was a cold and rainy day in New York City and a week before Christmas
when the overflow crowd piled into Harlem's historic Abyssinian Baptist
Church to remember and to celebrate a woman who had touched more lives
than she herself could have realized. Those who came to honor Ella
Baker wore fur coats, African prints, Islamic kufis, and yarmulkes.
They were young with dreadlocks and elderly with graying temples and
receding hairlines. They were black and white and a myriad of shades in
between, men and women, rich and poor, those formally educated and
those self taught. Among those who gathered were politicians, religious
leaders, entertainers, and renowned scholars. Crowded in among the
celebrities were those whom Ella Baker sometimes referred to as the
little people: people without credentials or titles, but people she had
valued and respected in her life, and who now honored her in death.
They were neighbors, local merchants, and even those who didn't know
Ella Baker personally but knew her enough by reputation that they came
to pay their respects. This is what Ella Baker had done for decades. If
a child was born or if someone in her extended family passed away, she
found time to acknowledge the importance of that singular life. Harlem
activist Yori Kochiyama, an internment camp survivor who was on the
speaker's platform with Malcolm X when he was assassinated, remembered
fondly Ella Baker's kindness toward her family when her son, Billy,
died in 1975. Ella Baker did not know Billy Kochiyama, really. He had
gone to Mississippi in 1965 as an act of solidarity with the growing
Black Freedom Movement, and they crossed paths briefly. When he died
tragically ten years later, Baker sent a telegram and made a phone call
to Billy's parents to express her condolences. Yori Kochiyama, who had
admired Baker from a distance, and met her only once, treasured the
gesture. Yori Kochiyama in turn paid her respects that rainy December
day in Harlem.[4]
Throughout
much of her life Ella Baker was a radical humanist and a consummate
coalition builder, connecting young and old, black and white, neophytes
and veterans, and staunch leftists and ambivalent moderates. Gathered
together in the Abyssinian church that day was the eclectic and
sometimes fractious group of people Baker had claimed as her political
family. Crowded shoulder to shoulder, they found their political
differences receding in their shared admiration for a fallen comrade,
sister, teacher, and mother. Ardent nationalists, orthodox Marxists,
establishment politicians, and free-floating radicals—people
with long-standing antagonisms, some of whom hadn't spoken to each
other in years—mingled in a slow common procession. Only Ella
Baker could convene such a gathering. There were touching moments that
suggested her political children had actually internalized her belief
that in the end the politics are only as important as the real human
beings whom we struggle with and for. Standing at Baker's graveside in
the frigid December air, white activist Bob Zellner found himself
positioned between his two old friends, Jamil Al-Amin (H. Rap Brown)
and Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael): two men who had come to symbolize
"Black Power" and had been associated with militant black nationalist
rhetoric. There they stood, the three of them together. Al-Amin draped
his coat around the ill-clad Zellner, and Ture quietly shared his
umbrella. No words were exchanged.
The
voice that echoed most powerfully through the cavernous church where
Ella Baker's funeral was held was that of Bernice Johnson Reagon, one
of Ella Baker's political daughters and founder of the black women's a
cappella group Sweet Honey in the Rock. Her commanding voice drew
attention to every line of Ella Baker's favorite movement song, "Guide
My Feet." "Guide my feet, while I run this race, … because I
don't want to run this race alone … because I don't want to
run this race in vain." And Ella Baker did neither. She ran long, she
ran hard, and she ran with a diverse assortment of folks over some
sixty years. Ella Baker did not represent any single tendency of the
American left or a particular wing of the Black Freedom Movement;
rather, she forged a hybrid political vision and an inclusive style of
democratic leadership. The long-term goal, for which she admittedly had
no blueprint, was simply a more democratic, egalitarian, and humane
world. Baker's values and her deeply felt ideals guided her feet over
variegated and difficult terrain. In the race, she was not a sprinter
but a long distance runner.[5]
Ella Baker and the Black Freedom Movement
| Home
|